WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.290
<v Instructor>In this lesson,</v>

2
00:00:01.290 --> 00:00:04.020
we will learn about code stylometry.

3
00:00:04.020 --> 00:00:07.470
Code stylometry is the process of analyzing

4
00:00:07.470 --> 00:00:12.000
a developer's coding style to identify unique patterns

5
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:14.850
that could be used for malware attribution

6
00:00:14.850 --> 00:00:18.270
or to trace the origin of specific software.

7
00:00:18.270 --> 00:00:22.350
Code stylometry concepts include variant matching,

8
00:00:22.350 --> 00:00:26.130
code similarity, and malware attribution.

9
00:00:26.130 --> 00:00:28.680
Variant matching looks for similarities

10
00:00:28.680 --> 00:00:31.050
between different versions or variants

11
00:00:31.050 --> 00:00:33.030
of the same malware family.

12
00:00:33.030 --> 00:00:37.326
Next, code similarity focuses on comparing segments of code

13
00:00:37.326 --> 00:00:40.530
across multiple samples to detect

14
00:00:40.530 --> 00:00:44.310
shared structures, functions, or techniques.

15
00:00:44.310 --> 00:00:48.390
And finally, malware attribution uses these findings

16
00:00:48.390 --> 00:00:50.014
to potentially link malware

17
00:00:50.014 --> 00:00:53.550
to a specific threat actor or group

18
00:00:53.550 --> 00:00:57.990
by recognizing unique coding habits or a reused code.

19
00:00:57.990 --> 00:01:00.450
Let's learn more about variant matching,

20
00:01:00.450 --> 00:01:03.630
code similarity, and malware attribution.

21
00:01:03.630 --> 00:01:06.630
First, we have variant matching.

22
00:01:06.630 --> 00:01:10.530
Variant matching is a technique used in code stylometry

23
00:01:10.530 --> 00:01:14.106
to identify similarities between different versions

24
00:01:14.106 --> 00:01:18.360
or variants of the same malware family.

25
00:01:18.360 --> 00:01:21.780
This method is particularly valuable when new strains

26
00:01:21.780 --> 00:01:25.110
of malware are released with slight modifications,

27
00:01:25.110 --> 00:01:29.190
such as changes in the code structure or functionality.

28
00:01:29.190 --> 00:01:33.510
Modifications are often made to malware to evade detection

29
00:01:33.510 --> 00:01:38.070
by security tools that recognize known malware signatures.

30
00:01:38.070 --> 00:01:41.914
So attackers tweak the code structure or functionality

31
00:01:41.914 --> 00:01:45.270
to bypass these defenses while keeping

32
00:01:45.270 --> 00:01:48.330
the core malicious behavior intact.

33
00:01:48.330 --> 00:01:52.054
By analyzing these variants, security teams can recognize

34
00:01:52.054 --> 00:01:56.070
evolving threats before they cause significant harm.

35
00:01:56.070 --> 00:01:59.310
For example, a new malware strain might have

36
00:01:59.310 --> 00:02:02.490
a different payload or obfuscation technique,

37
00:02:02.490 --> 00:02:04.230
but still carry remnants

38
00:02:04.230 --> 00:02:07.170
of the original coding style or structure.

39
00:02:07.170 --> 00:02:10.890
Variant matching enables analysts to link these changes

40
00:02:10.890 --> 00:02:13.380
back to the same malware family,

41
00:02:13.380 --> 00:02:16.920
ensuring rapid identification and response.

42
00:02:16.920 --> 00:02:18.990
In an enterprise environment,

43
00:02:18.990 --> 00:02:21.660
variant matching plays an important role

44
00:02:21.660 --> 00:02:25.320
in improving threat detection and incident response.

45
00:02:25.320 --> 00:02:28.290
When a security team encounters new malware,

46
00:02:28.290 --> 00:02:30.616
variant matching helps them quickly determine

47
00:02:30.616 --> 00:02:35.250
if it's a previously known threat or something entirely new.

48
00:02:35.250 --> 00:02:37.530
This is important because enterprises

49
00:02:37.530 --> 00:02:40.020
often face continuous attacks

50
00:02:40.020 --> 00:02:43.260
from malware families that evolve over time.

51
00:02:43.260 --> 00:02:46.440
By using variant matching, organizations can stay

52
00:02:46.440 --> 00:02:50.711
one step ahead by recognizing how the malware is adapting

53
00:02:50.711 --> 00:02:54.360
and developing appropriate countermeasures.

54
00:02:54.360 --> 00:02:57.030
This proactive approach can save

55
00:02:57.030 --> 00:03:01.050
significant time and resources during incident response,

56
00:03:01.050 --> 00:03:05.040
preventing further damage from known malware families.

57
00:03:05.040 --> 00:03:07.800
Second, we have code similarity.

58
00:03:07.800 --> 00:03:10.650
Code similarity is another important concept

59
00:03:10.650 --> 00:03:13.530
in code stylometry, focusing on comparing

60
00:03:13.530 --> 00:03:17.430
segments of code across different samples to identify

61
00:03:17.430 --> 00:03:20.700
shared structures, techniques, or functions.

62
00:03:20.700 --> 00:03:24.090
It helps security analysts discover common code snippets

63
00:03:24.090 --> 00:03:27.330
or algorithms reused across malware

64
00:03:27.330 --> 00:03:29.670
or even legitimate software.

65
00:03:29.670 --> 00:03:32.613
This process enables security teams to link

66
00:03:32.613 --> 00:03:36.660
seemingly unrelated pieces of software or malware

67
00:03:36.660 --> 00:03:38.910
based on shared characteristics.

68
00:03:38.910 --> 00:03:42.360
So, code similarity allows teams to find

69
00:03:42.360 --> 00:03:45.660
relationships between different malware families,

70
00:03:45.660 --> 00:03:47.520
providing broader insights

71
00:03:47.520 --> 00:03:50.340
into an attacker's coding practices.

72
00:03:50.340 --> 00:03:53.610
In an enterprise setting, code similarity can be used

73
00:03:53.610 --> 00:03:56.820
to detect malware or software vulnerabilities

74
00:03:56.820 --> 00:03:59.760
by comparing a new code against a database

75
00:03:59.760 --> 00:04:03.180
of known malware samples or exploits.

76
00:04:03.180 --> 00:04:07.860
This helps organizations identify potential threats early

77
00:04:07.860 --> 00:04:10.700
and understand the methods attackers use

78
00:04:10.700 --> 00:04:13.470
to craft their malicious software.

79
00:04:13.470 --> 00:04:17.100
For example, if a security team finds that

80
00:04:17.100 --> 00:04:20.790
a piece of malicious code shares a significant portion

81
00:04:20.790 --> 00:04:24.690
of its structure with a known exploit, they can quickly

82
00:04:24.690 --> 00:04:29.550
identify the threat and take steps to protect their systems.

83
00:04:29.550 --> 00:04:34.550
Also, code similarity can help identify software plagiarism

84
00:04:35.010 --> 00:04:38.460
where developers copy significant parts of code

85
00:04:38.460 --> 00:04:42.510
from other sources without permission or attribution.

86
00:04:42.510 --> 00:04:46.440
A practical example of code similarity could involve

87
00:04:46.440 --> 00:04:50.460
a security team analyzing a new piece of malware.

88
00:04:50.460 --> 00:04:54.510
Upon comparing its code to previous malware samples,

89
00:04:54.510 --> 00:04:57.570
the security team could find that malware uses

90
00:04:57.570 --> 00:05:01.920
the same encryption algorithm as a known banking trojan.

91
00:05:01.920 --> 00:05:05.760
So despite their differences in the malware structure

92
00:05:05.760 --> 00:05:09.480
and delivery method, this similarity could help the team

93
00:05:09.480 --> 00:05:13.470
link the new malware to a specific group of attackers

94
00:05:13.470 --> 00:05:16.176
known for targeting financial institutions.

95
00:05:16.176 --> 00:05:21.176
This allows the enterprise to adapt its security defenses

96
00:05:21.300 --> 00:05:24.900
to mitigate future attacks from this group.

97
00:05:24.900 --> 00:05:29.310
Third and last, we have malware attribution.

98
00:05:29.310 --> 00:05:32.640
Malware attribution is the process of linking

99
00:05:32.640 --> 00:05:37.050
a particular piece of malware to a specific developer,

100
00:05:37.050 --> 00:05:40.440
group, or threat actor, often by analyzing

101
00:05:40.440 --> 00:05:43.350
their unique coding habits and patterns.

102
00:05:43.350 --> 00:05:47.580
By identifying specific markers such as coding style,

103
00:05:47.580 --> 00:05:51.210
reused libraries, or preferred algorithms,

104
00:05:51.210 --> 00:05:55.170
security analysts can trace the origin of the malware.

105
00:05:55.170 --> 00:05:59.674
This process helps enterprises and law enforcement agencies

106
00:05:59.674 --> 00:06:04.020
understand who is behind certain attacks, which can aid

107
00:06:04.020 --> 00:06:07.770
in broader investigations or defense strategies.

108
00:06:07.770 --> 00:06:12.240
In essence, malware attribution turns code stylometry

109
00:06:12.240 --> 00:06:15.390
into a tool for cyber forensics.

110
00:06:15.390 --> 00:06:19.462
Within an enterprise malware attribution helps organizations

111
00:06:19.462 --> 00:06:24.120
understand the nature of the threats they face.

112
00:06:24.120 --> 00:06:27.180
Knowing the threat actors behind an attack

113
00:06:27.180 --> 00:06:30.570
can help enterprises predict future risks

114
00:06:30.570 --> 00:06:34.380
and adapt their cybersecurity strategies accordingly.

115
00:06:34.380 --> 00:06:37.530
For example, if an organization knows

116
00:06:37.530 --> 00:06:41.430
that a particular group tends to target their industry,

117
00:06:41.430 --> 00:06:44.010
they can prepare by strengthening defenses

118
00:06:44.010 --> 00:06:46.710
against that group's known tactics.

119
00:06:46.710 --> 00:06:50.160
Additionally, attributing discovered malware

120
00:06:50.160 --> 00:06:52.920
to a specific threat actor can help

121
00:06:52.920 --> 00:06:55.410
in collaborating with law enforcement

122
00:06:55.410 --> 00:06:58.800
or sharing intelligence with industry partners.

123
00:06:58.800 --> 00:07:03.240
An example of malware attribution could involve identifying

124
00:07:03.240 --> 00:07:07.440
a piece of ransomware targeting a company's systems.

125
00:07:07.440 --> 00:07:10.740
In this situation, the security team discovers

126
00:07:10.740 --> 00:07:14.340
that the malware shares several unique coding features

127
00:07:14.340 --> 00:07:16.770
with past attacks attributed to

128
00:07:16.770 --> 00:07:19.350
a specific cyber criminal group.

129
00:07:19.350 --> 00:07:21.690
These features include the use

130
00:07:21.690 --> 00:07:24.420
of a particular encryption library

131
00:07:24.420 --> 00:07:27.930
and a distinct way of handling error logging.

132
00:07:27.930 --> 00:07:31.710
By recognizing these patterns, the team can competently

133
00:07:31.710 --> 00:07:35.004
attribute the attack to this group, giving the enterprise

134
00:07:35.004 --> 00:07:39.180
valuable insight into the attacker's motives

135
00:07:39.180 --> 00:07:42.840
and helping prevent future attacks from the same source

136
00:07:42.840 --> 00:07:45.851
by enabling specific defenses to be put in place

137
00:07:45.851 --> 00:07:48.960
for the tactics, techniques, and procedures

138
00:07:48.960 --> 00:07:51.840
that the attributed threat group uses.

139
00:07:51.840 --> 00:07:56.220
So remember, code stylometry is the study

140
00:07:56.220 --> 00:08:00.990
of a developer's coding style to uncover unique patterns

141
00:08:00.990 --> 00:08:03.810
that can help with malware attribution

142
00:08:03.810 --> 00:08:07.620
or identifying the origin of specific software.

143
00:08:07.620 --> 00:08:10.590
This involves three key concepts,

144
00:08:10.590 --> 00:08:15.360
variant matching, code similarity, and malware attribution.

145
00:08:15.360 --> 00:08:18.858
Variant matching helps detect new malware strains

146
00:08:18.858 --> 00:08:22.470
by spotting similarities with older versions,

147
00:08:22.470 --> 00:08:25.110
despite any slight modifications.

148
00:08:25.110 --> 00:08:28.770
Next, code similarity compares different pieces

149
00:08:28.770 --> 00:08:32.700
of software or malware to identify common structures

150
00:08:32.700 --> 00:08:35.820
or techniques, which can reveal connections

151
00:08:35.820 --> 00:08:38.820
between seemingly unrelated samples.

152
00:08:38.820 --> 00:08:43.050
Finally, malware attribution links malicious software

153
00:08:43.050 --> 00:08:46.380
to specific developers or threat groups

154
00:08:46.380 --> 00:08:50.190
based on unique coding habits aiding in tracking

155
00:08:50.190 --> 00:08:53.733
and understanding cyber criminal activities.

